Walled garden advertising has long dominated the digital advertising ecosystem, giving marketers access to vast audiences and powerful targeting capabilities.Â
But the cracks are starting to show.
As costs rise and transparency shrinks, brands are increasingly frustrated by the data silos in walled gardens that make it difficult to measure performance across platforms.Â
Limited visibility, higher CPMs, and attribution blind spots are leaving marketers questioning whether the trade-offs are worth it.
In this guide, we’ll cover the walled garden definition, explain why its dominance is shifting, and share strategies for thriving in a future that blends both closed platforms and the open web.
A walled garden in advertising refers to a closed ecosystem where a single platform controls nearly every aspect of the advertising experience: from data access and audience targeting to ad inventory and reporting.Â
Google, Meta, and Amazon are the most recognizable examples today, each offering vast user bases and tightly integrated ad tools.
The walled garden definition itself comes from the telecom industry of the 1990s, when companies like AOL or early mobile carriers created “closed” environments that kept users inside their own networks.Â
While the internet eventually opened up, the same model re-emerged in ad tech: large platforms built self-contained systems that give marketers access to powerful audiences but restrict what happens outside their walls.
Put simply, walled gardens in ad tech offer scale and precision, but the trade-off is limited transparency and minimal control for advertisers.
Walled gardens didn’t dominate digital advertising by accident. They offered a combination of scale, precision, and ease that marketers found hard to resist.
Advantages of a walled garden in advertising include:
For advertisers, these features translated into simplicity and performance.Â
Instead of juggling multiple platforms or struggling with fragmented data, brands could log into one dashboard, run campaigns, and quickly see results.Â
The promise of reach plus measurable ROI helped cement walled gardens as the default advertising choice for much of the past decade.
But for all their benefits, walled gardens come with significant drawbacks that are becoming harder for marketers to ignore.
To better understand why walled gardens are both attractive and problematic, it helps to weigh their benefits against their limitations.Â
The same features that once made them indispensable — scale, targeting, and simplicity — now come with trade-offs in cost, transparency, and control.
Closed systems may still deliver strong short-term results, but these challenges leave many marketers searching for more open, transparent alternatives to walled gardens.
The dominance of walled gardens is no longer absolute. Across the industry, there’s growing momentum toward a more open and interoperable advertising ecosystem.
As data silos become more frustrating for marketers, the industry is pushing for interoperability: the ability to connect and analyze data across multiple platforms.Â
By stitching together fragmented insights, advertisers gain a more holistic view of performance and can make smarter budget decisions.Â
This shift is powered by new analytics tools and cross-platform integrations designed to break down barriers that walled gardens created.
Retail media networks and programmatic open exchanges are emerging as powerful alternatives to walled gardens like Google and Meta.Â
Retailers like Walmart and Target are monetizing their shopper data, offering highly targeted ad opportunities with built-in purchase intent.Â
At the same time, programmatic exchanges provide transparency and flexibility, allowing brands to diversify spend beyond the big three platforms.
Governments and regulators are increasingly focused on consumer privacy, data transparency, and portability.Â
Frameworks like GDPR and CCPA, along with proposed legislation worldwide, push back against the opacity of walled gardens.Â
These pressures are forcing ad platforms to adapt, creating openings for more transparent and accountable advertising models.
Modern marketers can no longer rely on a single platform to measure success.Â
Instead, they need holistic measurement across channels that captures how every touchpoint — from search and social to email and retail media — contributes to the customer journey.Â
As expectations shift, advertisers are demanding tools that deliver cross-platform visibility and actionable insights.
Taken together, these shifts signal a clear reality: marketers can no longer rely on walled gardens alone.Â
To succeed in this new landscape, they need to start moving beyond walled gardens and developing strategies that blend the scale of closed platforms with the transparency and flexibility of the open web.Â
The end of walled garden dominance doesn’t mean marketers are left without powerful tools. It simply requires a smarter, more connected approach.Â
By blending closed-platform advantages with open-web opportunities, brands can build resilience and long-term growth.
The first step to breaking free from walled garden limitations is to unify performance data across channels.Â
Cross-platform measurement allows marketers to see how campaigns on Google, Meta, Amazon, and the open web interact to drive conversions, rather than viewing each in isolation.Â
With a consolidated perspective, advertisers can optimize spend with confidence.
As third-party cookies fade, first-party data has become a marketer’s most valuable asset.Â
Collecting and organizing customer data directly — through email lists, loyalty programs, or on-site behavior — provides independence from platform restrictions.Â
A strong first-party foundation ensures that brands maintain control and can activate insights wherever they choose to advertise.
Relying solely on platform-reported attribution risks overstating impact.Â
Incrementality testing and media mix modeling (MMM) offer alternative ways to measure true lift across campaigns.Â
By layering these approaches, marketers can validate whether spend is actually driving outcomes, enabling smarter budget reallocation across both closed and open ecosystems.
Finally, thriving in a fragmented landscape requires technology that connects the dots.Â
Tools like Northbeam integrate walled garden performance with open-web data, giving marketers a single source of truth.Â
This unified view not only improves transparency but also makes it easier to allocate budgets dynamically based on what’s really working.
In short, success beyond walled gardens in ad tech comes down to balance: using the scale of closed ecosystems while unlocking the transparency and flexibility of open web advertising.
Navigating the shift beyond walled gardens requires more than just strategy; it demands the right technology.Â
Northbeam delivers industry-leading analytics that connect performance data from both walled gardens and the open web.Â
Instead of relying on platform-reported metrics in isolation, brands can access a single, unified view that reveals the full customer journey across channels.Â
This makes it possible to see what’s truly driving revenue, and where budget can be better allocated.
‍
Equally important, Northbeam’s platform is built with a privacy-first design. Marketers gain actionable, transparent insights without sacrificing compliance or user trust.Â
By balancing precision with accountability, Northbeam empowers brands to make decisions with confidence in a post-walled-garden world.
Walled gardens have shaped the past decade of digital advertising, offering scale, targeting, and efficiency that made them nearly irresistible. But as costs rise and transparency erodes, their limitations are becoming impossible to ignore. The future of advertising won’t be about choosing between closed platforms and the open web — it will be about finding the right balance between the two.
Marketers who embrace cross-platform measurement, invest in first-party data, and adopt advanced testing methodologies will be better positioned to thrive in this evolving landscape. Technology partners like Northbeam make this possible, providing a unified view of performance across both walled gardens and open ecosystems while upholding privacy and trust.
Ultimately, the winners in the post-walled-garden era will be the brands that prioritize transparency, flexibility, and accountability — leveraging the best of both worlds to drive sustainable growth.
‍
For most advertisers, ROAS is the north star. It’s the number that gets shared in boardrooms, the metric that determines whether a campaign is celebrated or cut.
But after years of working with brands that spend millions each month on paid social, I can tell you: ROAS alone doesn’t tell the whole story. In fact, it can often hide the very signals that determine whether your advertising is growing the business or just chasing its own tail.
ROAS is seductive because it looks so clean. Spend a dollar, get three back — what’s not to love? The problem is, you can generate strong ROAS numbers while shrinking your brand’s future.
Here’s a common scenario: a campaign shows stellar ROAS, but when you zoom out you realize it’s just hitting the same warm audience over and over again. Incremental reach is declining. Year-over-year, fewer new people are hearing about the brand, but you’d never see that looking at ROAS alone.
If you only optimize for purchases, you risk overfishing the same pond. It feels good in the short term, but long term you’re missing the forest for the trees.
Part of the challenge is how consumers actually behave today. We’re living in a “zero-click” environment. People screenshot ads, search the brand on Google, jump into Amazon, or check out a review on YouTube. They might not click your ad at all, but it still played a role in their path to purchase.
That means click-through rates and last-click ROAS are losing relevance.
If you’re not paying attention to reach, frequency, and the quality of your creative, you’re blind to a huge portion of the customer journey.
Think of reach and frequency as your advertising vital signs.
On Meta, for example, only about 20% of users are actively “in-market” at a given time. If your campaigns are only optimized for purchases, you’re just fighting over that small slice of users.
You’re leaving 80% of your potential future buyers untouched.
That’s why it’s critical to balance harvesting demand with creating it. The healthiest campaigns don’t just convert the people who are ready right now — they plant seeds with the people who will be ready in a week, a month, or even a year.
To track this bigger picture, I rely on a few custom metrics:
None of these replace ROAS.
But together, they create a much clearer view of whether your advertising is truly expanding your brand.
In many ways, paid social today looks a lot like TV advertising decades ago. The question isn’t just “what did this spot return?” but “how many people did we reach, how often, and how strong was the creative?”
The fundamentals are back: consistent reach, healthy frequency, and compelling creative that entertains, engages, and earns attention. ROAS still matters, but it’s just one piece of the puzzle.
If you only measure ROAS, you’re probably missing the very growth you’re trying to buy. Brands that win in today’s landscape are the ones that step back, look beyond short-term performance, and invest in reach, frequency, and creative fundamentals that build demand over the long haul.
That’s not just theory. It’s the reality I see every day managing large-scale accounts. The advertisers who understand this shift don’t just report good numbers — they build brands that last.
‍If you’ve ever clicked a Facebook or Instagram ad and noticed a strange string containing “fbclid” in the URL, you’re not alone.Â
Marketers often come across this mysterious parameter without knowing what it does — or why it matters.
This parameter, fbclid (short for Facebook Click Identifier), plays a critical role in Meta ad tracking.Â
It allows marketers to tie individual clicks to on-site behavior and downstream conversions, making it essential for accurate attribution and campaign optimization.
In this guide, we’ll break down exactly what fbclid is, how it works, and why it matters. You’ll learn how to capture and track it using tools like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, avoid common pitfalls, and follow best practices to ensure you’re getting the most out of every Meta ad click.
If you’ve ever looked at a URL from a Facebook or Instagram ad and noticed a string like “?fbclid=XYZ123” tacked on the end, you’ve encountered the Facebook Click Identifier, or fbclid.Â
This parameter is automatically appended by Meta when a user clicks on an ad or link within its ecosystem.
At its core, fbclid is a unique tracking parameter that helps Meta monitor user behavior after an ad click.Â
It enables click-level attribution by linking the specific click to actions that occur further down the funnel, such as a page view, add-to-cart, or purchase.Â
This level of detail is essential for measuring campaign effectiveness and optimizing ad performance.
It’s important to understand how fbclid and UTM parameters differ, and how they can work in tandem to improve tracking and attribution.
UTMs are manual tags created by marketers to track traffic across platforms like Google Ads, email campaigns, affiliate programs, and more.Â
They’re flexible and customizable, making them ideal for multi-channel tracking and reporting in tools like Google Analytics.
fbclid, on the other hand, is a Meta-specific parameter that is automatically added to URLs when users click on Facebook or Instagram ads.
It enables click-level attribution by linking user engagement to conversion events within Meta’s ad ecosystem.
While they serve different purposes, the best practice is to use fbclid and UTMs together.Â
fbclid helps Meta attribute performance within its platform, while UTMs offer visibility across other marketing channels.Â
When combined, they provide a more complete and accurate picture of how your campaigns are performing, both inside and outside of Meta.
For marketers running Meta campaigns, fbclid plays a critical role in connecting the dots between ad clicks and business outcomes. Without it, key insights into performance and customer behavior can easily be lost.
Here’s why fbclid matters:
fbclid allows Meta to track exactly which ad a user clicked before taking an action like completing a purchase or signing up.Â
This level of attribution helps marketers understand which creatives, audiences, and placements are driving real results.
By capturing fbclid on your website or landing page, you can feed back valuable conversion data into Meta’s platform.Â
This enhances event matching, strengthens reporting, and fuels more effective ad optimization.
When fbclid is captured and tied to user behavior, Meta can better retarget warm leads and build high-quality lookalike audiences based on real post-click engagement, not just impressions or views.
Without fbclid (or with improper setup), traffic from Facebook and Instagram can show up as “direct” in tools like Google Analytics.Â
This muddies your data and makes it harder to attribute success to the correct channels.
In short, fbclid isn’t just a random string in your URLs, it’s the key to unlocking full-funnel visibility and driving better campaign performance on Meta.
The fbclid parameter may look like a small string of characters in your URL, but behind the scenes, it’s quietly powering some of the most important attribution and optimization features in Meta’s ad platform.
Here’s a simple breakdown of how fbclid works:
To make fbclid work for you, it’s not enough to let Meta add the parameter: you need to capture it on your website and pass it into your analytics or CRM systems or valuable click-level attribution data may be lost.
Here’s how to capture and track fbclid using common tools:
Google Analytics doesn’t automatically display fbclid, but you can set it up to capture and store it: use Google Analytics’ built-in ability to log URL parameters in event data, or create a custom dimension to track fbclid across user sessions.
Once captured, fbclid values can be tied to conversion events and help validate Meta Ad tracking reporting with fbclid.
đź’ˇ Pro tip: Create a Google Analytics exploration that segments users by presence of fbclid to analyze Meta-driven behavior.
If you use GTM, you can create a variable to pull the fbclid value from the URL and send it to GA4, your CRM, or other platforms.
First, create a URL Variable in GTM to capture fbclid. Then set up a Custom Event Tag to store the variable in GA4 or pass it to other tools. Optionally, write it to a cookie or session storage for use across pages
đź’ˇ Pro tip: This is especially helpful when users navigate beyond your landing page and you want to preserve the fbclid across sessions.
For advanced setups, you can capture the fbclid server-side or send it directly into your CRM.
Use scripts on your landing page to extract the fbclid and associate it with a user or session. Store it in hidden form fields, database entries, or session cookies.
đź’ˇ Pro tip: Send the fbclid with conversion events to platforms like Meta, HubSpot, or Salesforce for offline event matching.
Here’s a simple JavaScript snippet that captures fbclid and stores it in a cookie:
// Capture fbclid in URLs
const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
const fbclid = urlParams.get('fbclid');
if (fbclid) {
document.cookie = `fbclid=${fbclid}; path=/; max-age=2592000`; // 30 days
}
‍‍
đź’ˇ Pro tip: Once in a cookie, the fbclid can be accessed on future page loads or submitted with forms.
While fbclid is a powerful tool for Meta ad attribution, it’s not always plug-and-play.Â
Many marketers miss out on its full benefits due to setup gaps, misunderstandings, or technical issues.
Here are four of the most common challenges:
Just like UTM parameters, the fbclid can be stripped out during redirects, especially if your landing page URL passes through a link shortener, third-party service, or tracking tool.
Capturing fbclid requires intentional configuration in tools like GA4, GTM, or your CRM.Â
If your setup doesn’t explicitly track this parameter, it won’t show up in reports, leading to underreporting of Meta ad tracking performance for fbclid.
A common misconception is that fbclid can replace UTM parameters.Â
In reality, it’s not an either/or: fbclid serves a unique purpose within Meta’s ecosystem, while UTMs provide broader cross-platform tracking.
Some marketers worry that fbclid might contain personally identifiable information (PII).Â
Fortunately, fbclid is fully anonymized: it’s just a unique identifier used for tracking a session, not a specific person.
To get the most out of fbclid, marketers need more than just awareness. They need systems in place that consistently capture, preserve, and leverage this data for smarter fbclid attribution.
Here are four best practices to follow:
Make sure your landing page setup, including any redirect chains, doesn’t strip fbclid in URLs.Â
Whether you’re using link shorteners, third-party tools, or campaign tracking layers, test for fbclid retention across every step.
fbclid gives you deep visibility into Meta ad performance, but it doesn’t replace UTMs.
To understand cross-channel journeys and build cohesive fbclid attribution models, you should use both fbclid and UTM tags together.
Even small changes in your site structure, forms, or analytics tools can break fbclid capture.
Set a recurring check-in (monthly or quarterly) to confirm that fbclid is still being tracked correctly in GA4, GTM, or your CRM.
Manual fbclid tracking can only take you so far.Â
Platforms like Northbeam help reconcile fbclid with your broader attribution stack, from Google Ads to influencer traffic, so you can measure Meta’s true impact in a multi-touch journey.
The fbclid parameter may be invisible to most users, but it’s essential to marketers who want accurate, reliable Meta ad or fbclid attribution.Â
When properly captured and paired with UTM parameters, fbclid provides the click-level visibility needed to understand what’s actually driving conversions, and where your budget is making the biggest impact.
From improving retargeting accuracy to preventing misattributed “direct” traffic, fbclid is a small but powerful tool in your tracking toolkit.