




‍This article, our associated whitepaper, and the webinar I hosted, are based on Northbeam’s internal proprietary Clicks-Only data.
For DTC brands, Cyber Week 2025 wasn’t just “another record year.” It was a clear signal that peak season is now a strategy game, not a “spend big and hope for the best” game.
Across Northbeam’s customer base, we saw ad spend rise by just over 9% year over year, while revenue grew more than 13%, lifting MER even as first‑time CAC climbed about 8%. In other words: shoppers are still willing to buy, but they’re a lot more selective about when and how they convert.
This blog is a high‑level walkthrough of what we saw across thousands of DTC brands during Cyber Week 2025, and how the best teams are already adjusting their playbooks for 2026.
If you want the full channel‑by‑channel, industry, and company‑size breakdowns, grab the report this blog is based on:
Get the full data set: Download the BFCM 2025: The Report whitepaper for all charts, daily breakdowns, and industry cuts.

Long gone are the days of lining up outside a big‑box retailer at midnight. The in‑store moment may have faded, but the online punch of Black Friday/Cyber Monday is absolutely still there, it just starts earlier and stretches longer.
When we looked at the 21‑day run‑up to Cyber Week (Nov 4–24), a few things stood out:
Put simply, advertisers were priming the pump. They were willing to pay more to get in front of new customers before the sale, knowing that a meaningful chunk of that demand would only convert once the “real” offers went live.
That’s conversion lag in practice:
Dollars spent early in November convert during the sale itself, sometimes days or even weeks later.
If you only look at 1‑day click ROAS in‑platform, this early‑month spend can look terrible. When you look at it through a multi‑touch, cross‑channel lens, it suddenly becomes clear that your “expensive” pre‑BFCM dollars are actually doing a lot of the heavy lifting for peak week performance.
In the full report: we break down the Nov 4–24 period in more detail and show exactly how spend, revenue, MER, and first‑time CAC moved during those three weeks.
Watch the full webinar I hosted right here!
From a distance, Cyber Week still looks like what you’d expect: spend ramps into Black Friday, stays elevated through Cyber Monday, then cools off. But when you zoom in day‑by‑day, the pattern is a lot more instructive.

Here’s the simplified version of what we saw:
This is why we’re pushing clients to stop thinking in terms of “What’s my Black Friday budget?” and start thinking in terms of “What’s my Cyber Week arc?”
Some practical implications:
Despite all the noise about new platforms, Meta and Google are still the foundation of DTC performance marketing during Cyber Week.
Across our dataset:
In other words: if you’re trying to build a BFCM media plan without Meta and Google as your budget spine, you’re swimming upstream.
That said, we did see meaningful wallet‑share movement elsewhere:
The core takeaway:
Use emerging channels to diversify reach, not to “replace” Meta/Google.
Your job is to build a spine (Meta + Google), then layer in TikTok, Pinterest, YouTube, Snap, etc. in a way that actually adds incremental lift rather than just cannibalizing what you already have.
In the full report: we show detailed wallet share shifts, CPM/ROAS changes by platform, and a simple set of “rules of thumb” for how much budget most brands are safely putting into each non‑core channel today.
On aggregate, Cyber Week looks great. Under the hood, performance diverged sharply by company size and industry.
When we segmented brands by annual revenue, three different stories emerged:
We also saw clear category‑level winners and laggards:
The key message:
Your BFCM strategy has to be category‑specific. Elasticity, gifting dynamics, purchase frequency, and payback windows are wildly different by vertical — your benchmarks and budget ladders should be, too.
Coming out of Cyber Week, here’s how I’d recommend you operationalize these learnings.

Your “peak week” numbers are already out of date. Update:
If you’re with Northbeam, this is a great time to align your Benchmarks/Stoplights with what “good” actually looks like post‑BFCM.
If you only look at click‑only models, you’ll wildly underestimate:
Swap between Clicks‑Only and Clicks + Deterministic Views (C+DV) in your reporting to see where net‑new demand actually came from in 2025, and use that to inform where you test harder in 2026.
Media mix modeling (MMM) and incrementality testing have gone from “nice to have” to non‑negotiable:
CPMs almost always cool off post‑BFCM, especially in Q1. That’s your window to:
This blog barely scratches the surface of what we saw in the data.
If you’re planning budgets for 2026 — or just trying to sanity‑check how your brand stacked up — I’d strongly recommend digging into the full whitepaper:
Download the full BFCM 2025: The Report to get:
Cyber Week 2025 made one thing clear: the demand is still there — but the brands that win are the ones that plan, measure, and adapt smarter than everyone else.

As privacy rules tighten and third-party cookies fade out, marketers are looking for reliable ways to reach the right people and measure what actually drives results; second-party data offers a practical path forward.Â
In this guide, we break down what second-party data is, why it matters, and how to integrate it into your performance and measurement workflows.Â
You’ll learn the core benefits, the steps to build a data partnership, how second-party data affects attribution accuracy, and the potential risks to watch for as you scale.Â
‍Most importantly, you’ll learn how to use partnerships to unlock better second-party audience data, clearer insights, and stronger returns with privacy top of mind.Â

‍Second-party data is essentially another organization’s first-party data that you access through a direct, trusted partnership.Â
It sits in the middle of the data ecosystem:
‍You gain access to new audiences and behavioral signals, but with the clarity and provenance that third-party datasets typically lack.
This matters more than ever. With third-party cookies fading out and privacy regulations raising the bar on data governance, marketers need scalable ways to target effectively without compromising on accuracy.Â
From an attribution standpoint, the impact is even more meaningful. Higher match rates and cleaner identifiers reduce “unknown” traffic, improve funnel visibility, and help performance teams measure campaign outcomes with greater confidence.Â
‍In short, better data leads to better decisions, and second-party data delivers both the quality and context needed to get there.
The benefits of second-party data partnerships center around new opportunities for marketers who want to scale intelligently while keeping data quality and governance front and center.Â
‍Here’s how to use second-party data for marketing campaigns:Â
Second-party partnerships give you access to high-intent audiences you wouldn’t reach on your own, without sacrificing signal quality.Â
Partner data comes with stronger identifiers, clearer consent, and more reliable behavioral signals. That makes it easier to target efficiently and avoid wasted spend.
Because partner data often includes detailed attributes or engagement insights, it can enrich your existing segments and strengthen lookalike modeling. When your seed audiences improve, so does the performance of your acquisition campaigns.Â
Second-party data can fill critical gaps in your first-party view. If your customers interact with adjacent brands, publishers, or ecosystems before reaching you, partner data helps surface those touchpoints and clarify the full funnel path.Â
Marketing data partnerships don’t stop at targeting. They enable joint campaigns, shared audience insights, and collaborative creative strategies. This can lead to lower acquisition costs, expanded brand equity, and a more unified customer experience across channels.
Because many second-party relationships are exclusive or bilateral, they offer differentiation competitors can’t easily replicate. Access to unique, high-fidelity audiences often translates into better performance and a more resilient acquisition engine.

‍Here are the steps teams should follow to evaluate, integrate, and activate partner data with confidence.
Second-party data and attribution strategy can have an outsized impact on overall performance because they add clarity to parts of the customer journey that are normally opaque.Â
When you introduce partner-sourced identifiers and behaviors into your stack, match rates typically rise and audience definitions sharpen. That means fewer users fall into “unknown” buckets, giving your attribution models a more complete and accurate picture of how people move through the funnel.
‍This additional visibility matters most when partner data captures behaviors outside your usual domain.Â
If a customer engages with an adjacent brand or publisher before finding you, those touchpoints often disappear in a standard first-party view. With second-party data, you can track that interaction through to conversion and understand its true contribution to the path to purchase.
‍These new signals can also reshape how channels perform in your models. When previously invisible users become identifiable, conversion curves may shift, and channels that looked ineffective may reveal stronger influence.Â
‍It’s important to interpret these changes carefully. Not all improvements are inherently incremental, and partner audiences can introduce bias if left untested.Â
The most reliable approach is to use control groups, lift studies, or holdout tests to confirm the real, incremental impact of second-party data on performance.
Without valid consent frameworks, partner alignment, and proper documentation, even high-quality data can introduce legal and reputational risk.Â
Here are some challenges and best practices to consider:Â
Partner data isn’t automatically reliable.Â
Audits are still essential to check for outdated records, inconsistent identifiers, or misaligned segmentation. Stale or noisy data can derail targeting, inflate acquisition costs, and lead to misleading insights.
Integrating partner datasets requires precise matching logic, consistent identifiers, and alignment across schemas.Â
Attribution and analytics pipelines may need updates to properly ingest and model new data layers. Small mismatches can create major downstream errors.
If the partner’s audience doesn’t overlap meaningfully with your target customers, performance will lag. Alignment should be evaluated early through audience comparisons, shared goals, and a clear understanding of what behaviors or attributes each side contributes.
Relying heavily on one data partner can create operational and strategic vulnerability. Diversification reduces the risk of data degradation, partnership changes, or cost escalations affecting performance.
Second-party data should be governed with the same rigor as your first-party data. Maintain clear documentation, lineage tracking, quality standards, and dashboards that monitor performance and usage.Â
Strong governance ensures long-term reliability and trust across teams.
Let’s see the value of second-party data by looking at how a consumer brand could partner with a publisher in an adjacent, non-competitive niche.Â
In this case, the publisher had a highly-engaged subscriber base with strong behavioral signals like content interests, purchase intent markers, and consistent on-site activity.Â
Through a direct data partnership, the brand gained access to a curated segment of these engaged users and used it to build targeted ad campaigns.
‍Once activated, the difference was immediate.Â
Match rates increased because the partner’s identifiers were clean and consented, and cost per acquisition dropped compared to the brand’s standard prospecting audiences.Â
In attribution reporting, the partner-derived segment converted at a materially higher rate and incremental ROAS outperformed baseline audiences by a meaningful margin. Those early signals gave the team confidence to scale spend and shift more budget toward the high-performing segment.
‍The full funnel told an even clearer story.Â
Partner data informed the audience build, the audience powered targeted ads and remarketing flows, and those campaigns fed clean, trackable conversions back into the attribution model.Â
That closed loop from data to activation to insight allowed the brand to refine strategy, allocate budget more efficiently, and grow performance with far greater precision.

To help your team move from theory to execution, here are clear next steps for evaluating, piloting, and scaling a second-party data partnership:
‍Taken together, these steps create a structured path for safely testing second-party data while building confidence in its long-term value.
Second-party data gives marketing and attribution teams a powerful way to boost targeting accuracy, improve measurement, and expand reach without sacrificing governance or data quality.
By partnering with trusted organizations, you gain access to high-fidelity signals that strengthen modeling, clarify the customer journey, and unlock new performance opportunities. The key is to approach these partnerships with intention: from evaluating alignment and defining governance to testing, measuring, and iterating your way into a scalable strategy.Â
‍Used well, second-party data can become a durable advantage in an increasingly privacy-first world.

Many marketing teams talk about being “data-driven,” but data maturity is a spectrum.Â
Some teams rely on basic reports pulled at the end of the month. Others operate with real-time insights, automated decisioning, and predictive models shaping strategy.Â
‍Understanding where your team falls on that spectrum, and how to move forward, is the core purpose of a marketing data maturity model.
In this guide, we’ll break down what “data maturity” means, the key dimensions that shape it, and the five stages most teams move through when moving from an ad-hoc to a data-mature marketing organization.

In a marketing context, data maturity reflects how effectively your team uses data to guide strategy, personalize outreach, optimize campaigns, and tie activity to measurable business outcomes.Â
Mature organizations don’t treat data as a reporting function. They use it as the connective tissue of their entire growth engine, from segmentation and creative testing to budgeting and lifecycle strategy.
‍The impact is tangible. Research from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) found that more digitally mature brands increased sales by 18% and improved cost efficiency by 29% compared to less mature peers.Â
In other words, data maturity is one of the clearest competitive advantages a marketing team can build.
‍Most teams can also recognize the early warning signs that they aren’t as data-mature as they’d like to be:
‍These patterns aren’t failures. They’re indicators of where you are today, and a starting point for building a more integrated, data-mature marketing organization.
To understand your level of data maturity, it helps to break the concept into core dimensions:
Data maturity starts with strategy and alignment. This means marketing KPIs are explicitly tied to business objectives, not created in isolation.Â
Mature teams work within a culture where data-informed decision-making is expected, shared, and reinforced, from leadership priorities to campaign planning.Â
Without this alignment, even the most sophisticated tools fail to drive meaningful outcomes.
Governance covers how your data is collected, cleaned, standardized, and maintained. High-maturity teams invest in master data management, ensure data accuracy and accessibility, and define processes that keep customer data trustworthy over time.
Your marketing tech stack is only as powerful as the connections between its components.Â
Modern architecture enables cross-channel data flow, unifies event and customer data, and supports real-time analytics.Â
If tools operate in silos or require heavy manual intervention, insights will lag and opportunities will be missed.
Analytics maturity evolves in stages:Â
As teams progress, data becomes less about reporting and more about foresight. Mature organizations incorporate modeling, forecasting, and experimentation into everyday workflows.
Technology can only take an organization so far. Data-mature teams cultivate literacy across their marketing organization and beyond, encouraging experimentation, and promoting tight collaboration among marketing, analytics, product, and engineering.Â
On these types of teams, curiosity and cross-functional problem-solving become cultural norms.
Ultimately, maturity shows up in how well data fuels daily marketing activity.Â
This includes smarter segmentation, personalization at scale, rigorous measurement, consistent optimization, and campaigns that adapt in real time.Â
The most mature teams close the loop between insight and action quickly and repeatedly.
‍These six dimensions form the framework for assessing your current state and identifying where maturity improvements will have the highest impact.
Every marketing team sits somewhere on the data-maturity spectrum. Understanding your stage helps you benchmark your current capabilities and set realistic expectations for growth.Â

Most organizations fall into one of five broad categories:
Teams at this stage rely on basic campaign metrics like impressions and clicks.Â
Data lives in channel-specific tools, reporting is inconsistent, and insights rarely influence strategy.Â
Most decision-making happens through intuition or past experience, making this the least scalable stage.
Some unification begins to take shape in Stage 2. Teams might connect a few data sources or build early cross-channel dashboards.Â
Segmentation and personalization are possible but limited, often requiring manual effort. This is the stage where teams recognize the value of data but haven’t yet operationalized it.
Data infrastructure becomes more robust and reliable in Stage 3. A shared customer view emerges, analytics begin driving decisions, and campaigns are optimized across channels rather than within silos.Â
Teams at this stage shift from reactive reporting to proactive insight generation.
In Stage 4, marketing becomes deeply integrated with predictive analytics, real-time optimization, and full-funnel measurement aligned to business outcomes.Â
Testing is systematic, insights flow quickly into activation, and data literacy is strong across the organization. This is where real competitive advantage becomes visible.
In Stage 5, marketing operates as a serious growth engine. AI, automation, and advanced modeling shape strategy at scale. Data is embedded into culture, not just tooling. Teams move with agility, adapting to customer behavior in real time and continuously learning from every interaction.
‍By identifying your stage, you can build a roadmap that’s ambitious but achievable. But how do you know exactly what stage you’re in now?Â
To assess your team’s data maturity, start by conducting a data-driven marketing maturity audit.Â
This involves scoring your team across each key dimension listed above:Â
Give yourself a score for each dimension. The goal isn’t to produce a perfect number, it’s to reveal patterns and help you decide where to focus first.Â
‍Many teams pair this internal audit with external benchmarking. Frameworks from Gartner and other industry leaders offer structured questionnaires and maturity rubrics that help you calibrate your results against peers and best-in-class organizations.Â

‍To bring your assessment to life, visualize your scores. A radar chart or similar diagnostic view makes maturity gaps immediately visible and highlights where investment will drive the biggest lift.Â
Often, you’ll see that one or two lagging dimensions disproportionately drag down your overall maturity level.
‍Most importantly, conduct the assessment collaboratively. Involving stakeholders from marketing, analytics, IT, data engineering, and even leadership ensures you’re capturing the full picture.Â
‍It also creates early buy-in for the roadmap you’ll build next, because maturity transformation is rarely a marketing-only project. It succeeds when the entire organization is aligned around the same goals, the same metrics, and the same definition of “data-driven.”
An assessment becomes meaningful once it turns into action.Â
After identifying your strengths and gaps, the next step is to build a phased roadmap that moves your organization toward greater data maturity in a realistic, sustainable way.Â
These are low-effort, high-impact improvements that unlock immediate value.Â
Examples include:
These require more coordination and investment, but fundamentally upgrade your marketing operations.Â
Common examples:
These initiatives help you reach full data maturity and create a scalable, self-optimizing marketing engine.Â
They often include:
Align your roadmap with measurable company goals such as:
To ensure maturity isn’t a one-off project, define:
Track indicators like:
Even with a clear roadmap, progressing through the stages of data maturity isn’t always straightforward.
Most teams encounter predictable obstacles that can slow down momentum or create false signals of progress. Being aware of these challenges upfront helps leaders navigate them with more intention and fewer surprises.
When channels, tools, or business units operate in isolation, insights stay fragmented and teams lose the ability to understand the full customer journey.
Many organizations underestimate the talent required to operationalize data maturity. It’s not just the tools, it’s analysts, engineers, and marketers who can translate data into meaningful action.
A shiny new tool can’t compensate for misaligned processes or a culture that doesn’t value experimentation and data-driven decision-making. Culture and operations must mature alongside the stack.
Moving from Stage 1 to Stage 4 isn’t a quick win. It requires sustained investment, organizational alignment, and a willingness to change how decisions are made.
As personalization becomes more sophisticated, compliance, consent, and responsible data use become non-negotiable components of maturity.
It’s easy to claim advanced capabilities without the underlying systems to support them. True data maturity is demonstrated through measurable impact, not labels.
‍With these challenges in mind, leaders can approach maturity work with clearer expectations and a more grounded path forward.
Consider a mid-size ecommerce brand operating squarely at Stage 2 of data maturity.Â
Their marketing efforts were spread across disconnected tools, each channel measured in isolation. Without a unified customer view, the team relied on surface-level metrics like clicks, opens, and last-touch attribution.
‍Their campaigns performed reasonably well, but growth had stalled; they couldn’t see what was working across the full customer journey.
To move forward, the team implemented a customer data platform (CDP) and consolidated cross-channel tracking.Â
They defined a shared set of KPIs, aligned stakeholders around a unified measurement framework, and rebuilt core dashboards to reflect customer-level behavior rather than channel-level outputs.
‍Within a quarter, the shift was clear.Â
Reporting evolved from “clicks only” to dark-funnel attribution and multi-touch insights. Campaigns moved from one-off initiatives to journey-based optimization, and tests scaled faster because the team could finally see which touchpoints drove incremental value.
‍These improvements lifted ROI, shortened the time from insight to action, and moved the organization firmly into Stage 3: Connected and Proactive.Â
Reaching higher levels of data maturity doesn’t require a massive transformation from day one. Small, structured steps can create meaningful momentum and help your team build confidence along the way.
Here is a quick checklist to help you get started:
‍Marketing data maturity isn’t static. It’s a continual process of strengthening foundations, refining processes, and expanding capabilities.
Every step forward compounds, and the brands that invest steadily unlock a clear advantage.
