A newsletter for modern marketers.
TRUSTED BY THE WORLD'S SMARTEST MARKETERS
Free ad performance benchmarks every week.
Live webinars and strategy sessions with industry leaders.
Watch all previous episodes on our YouTube channel.
Insider strategies from the smartest brands in ecommerce.
SEE LATEST POSTS:
Probabilistic vs. Deterministic Attribution Approaches In a Cookieless Future
The marketing measurement playbook is being rewritten.Â
As third-party cookies vanish and privacy regulations tighten, the traditional deterministic tracking methods that once gave marketers clarity are becoming less reliable.Â
Identifiers are disappearing, cross-device journeys are harder to stitch together, and walled gardens are closing off visibility.
That doesn’t mean measurement is dead: it means marketers need new tools.Â
‍Enter probabilistic attribution vs deterministic attribution: two complementary approaches that, when used together, provide a clear path forward in the cookieless future of marketing measurement.
Deterministic models give precision where user data is available, while probabilistic models fill the inevitable gaps with statistically reliable insights.Â
Blending the two creates a hybrid attribution strategy that balances accuracy with coverage, helping brands continue to measure performance and allocate budgets confidently.
Defining Deterministic and Probabilistic AttributionÂ
Both deterministic and probabilistic attribution models aim to answer the same question: which marketing touchpoints deserve credit for a conversion?Â
But they approach it in very different ways:
Deterministic Attribution
Deterministic attribution relies on exact matches between a user’s actions and their identity, often through login credentials, user IDs, or hashed email addresses.Â
It gives you pixel-level precision: if a logged-in customer clicks an ad and makes a purchase, you can confidently connect the dots.
Strengths:Â
- Highly accurate, especially when backed by robust first-party data like CRM integrations or loyalty programs.
Limitations:Â
- As third-party cookies vanish and privacy regulations tighten, deterministic tracking loses visibility outside of walled gardens and logged-in environments.Â
- Data gaps widen when identifiers aren’t available.
Probabilistic Attribution
Probabilistic attribution takes a different route.Â
Instead of requiring a perfect identifier, it uses statistical modeling and machine learning to infer the most likely conversion path.Â
Signals such as device type, location, time of day, and referrer can be combined to estimate user journeys with a high degree of confidence.
Strengths:Â
- Provides coverage when deterministic data isn’t available, bridges fragmented journeys across devices and channels.
- Adapts well to privacy-first environments.
Limitations:Â
- While sophisticated, it’s not a 100% exact match.
- Results are modeled probabilities, not certainties.
In short, deterministic attribution models provide precision, while probabilistic attribution provides coverage.Â
Why Both Deterministic and Probabilistic Approaches Are Vital TodayÂ
As third-party cookies disappear and privacy regulations tighten, marketers can no longer rely on a single attribution method.Â
Deterministic tracking, once the gold standard, is now limited by shrinking visibility outside of logged-in environments and walled gardens like Facebook or TikTok.Â
Even with strong first-party data, deterministic models can only capture part of the story, leaving blind spots in the customer journey.
This is where probabilistic attribution becomes essential.Â
By modeling likely paths with aggregate-level signals, probabilistic methods fill in the missing context:
- Estimating conversions where IDs aren’t available.
- Reconstructing fragmented, cross-device journeys.
- Extending visibility into channels where deterministic tracking breaks down.
Combine probabilistic and deterministic approaches to get the best of both worlds:
- Deterministic provides precision where identifiers exist.
- Probabilistic provides coverage where they don’t.
The result is a more complete, privacy-compliant measurement framework.Â
Instead of choosing one approach, forward-thinking marketers blend the two: using deterministic attribution models as the anchor for accuracy, and probabilistic attribution to ensure no piece of the funnel goes unseen.
When to Use Deterministic vs Probabilistic Approaches
Each model shines in different contexts, and together, they create a stronger foundation for marketing measurement.
When to Use a Deterministic Approach
Deterministic models are most effective when you have reliable identifiers and consented data.Â
Common scenarios include:
- Logged-in users on apps or websites (e.g., loyalty members, subscribers).
- CRM or CDP integrations that tie ad interactions directly to customer profiles.
- Environments where cookies or hashed identifiers remain accessible.
In these cases, deterministic attribution models ensure high-confidence matches between ad exposure and conversion, making it ideal for measuring retention campaigns, subscription funnels, or personalized remarketing.
When to Use a Probabilistic Approach
Probabilistic models excel when deterministic tracking breaks down. They’re particularly valuable in situations such as:
- Tracking disruptions: Cookie loss, ad blockers, or iOS privacy updates.
- Cross-device journeys: Customers moving between mobile, desktop, and connected TV.
- Regulatory environments: Where consent is limited or explicit IDs can’t be stored.
Here, probabilistic modeling allows marketers to maintain visibility into conversion paths without overstepping privacy boundaries.
Why Blending is the Smartest Approach
The strongest attribution strategies use deterministic data as the anchor for accuracy, then layer probabilistic models on top to fill in the gaps.Â
‍
This hybrid mindset ensures both confidence and coverage, creating a resilient measurement system in a world of cookieless attribution.
Northbeam’s Hybrid Attribution CapabilitiesÂ
While most attribution frameworks lean heavily on one method or the other, Northbeam is designed from the ground up to integrate both deterministic and probabilistic attribution.Â
This hybrid approach gives marketers precision where identifiers are available and reliable insights where data would otherwise disappear.
Clicks + Deterministic Views (C+DV)
One standout capability is Northbeam’s CDV model, which blends click data with view-through signals.Â
Instead of relying solely on last-click or impression-based rules, C+DV merges these inputs into a unified dataset that can confirm when an ad truly influenced a conversion.
For example, on platforms like TikTok and Snapchat, where many conversions happen after a view rather than a click, C+DV enables marketers to measure real view-through impact without inflating results.
This closes a major gap left by traditional deterministic tracking, which often undercounts conversions when users don’t interact directly with an ad.
Probabilistic Modeling for the Cookieless Attribution Era
Alongside deterministic anchors like CDV, Northbeam applies probabilistic attribution models to infer the likely paths of anonymous or cross-device users.Â
By using aggregate-level signals, these models expand coverage while maintaining compliance with privacy regulations.
The Hybrid Advantage
By combining deterministic insights with the advantages of probabilistic attribution, Northbeam solves the “real-funnel tracking” challenge:
- Precision: Deterministic models validate direct, consented journeys.
- Coverage: Probabilistic models ensure visibility across fragmented, cookieless attribution environments.
- Confidence: The hybrid view enables marketers to make high-stakes budget decisions with both accuracy and breadth.
This dual-layered system means that even as cookies vanish, Northbeam customers retain a clear, data-backed picture of performance from impression to conversion.
Implementation Guide
Understanding the theory is one thing; implementing it in your day-to-day measurement strategy is another.Â
Here’s a step-by-step guide for marketers who want future-proof attribution strategies for privacy-first environments:
1. Audit Your Current Tracking Setup
Begin by identifying gaps in your existing measurement framework.Â
Where are cookies or platform-level limitations creating blind spots? Which channels are you over- or under-counting due to incomplete attribution?
2. Strengthen Your First-Party Data Capture
Prioritize collecting and organizing consented, first-party data wherever possible.Â
Tactics include encouraging account creation, building loyalty programs, and syncing CRM/CDP systems.Â
This data forms the backbone of deterministic attribution.
3. Anchor Reporting with Deterministic Models
Use deterministic attribution wherever you have reliable identifiers, such as logged-in users or CRM-connected campaigns.Â
This provides a high-confidence foundation for reporting.
4. Layer in Probabilistic Models to Fill the Gaps
For channels or journeys where identifiers aren’t available, supplement with probabilistic attribution models.Â
This ensures you don’t lose visibility into anonymous, cross-device, or walled garden conversions.
5. Continuously Validate and Optimize
Hybrid attribution isn’t a “set it and forget it” process.Â
Regularly compare deterministic and probabilistic outcomes, run lift tests, and refine models as your data environment evolves.
Following these steps helps you build a measurement system that is both resilient and adaptable, balancing accuracy with the flexibility to handle data disruptions.
The Cookieless Future of Marketing Measurement
As cookies disappear and privacy restrictions intensify, no single attribution method can provide the complete picture.Â
Deterministic attribution offers the precision marketers need when identifiers are available, while probabilistic attribution models ensure coverage where deterministic models fall short.
Relying on just one leaves gaps; blending the two creates a measurement strategy that is both accurate and resilient.Â
The result is clear visibility into performance, confident budget allocation, and the ability to keep growing with bullet-proof attribution strategies in privacy-first environments.
Marketers who embrace this hybrid approach today will be best positioned to adapt, compete, and win in tomorrow’s cookieless landscape.
Multi-Touch Attribution Models: A Complete Guide to Measuring Every Marketing Touchpoint
Modern buyer journeys are anything but simple.
A customer might first discover your brand through a social ad, read a blog post days later, click a retargeting email, and finally convert after a branded search.
If you rely on single-touch attribution, giving 100% of the credit to either the first or last click, you miss the bigger picture.
That’s where Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA) comes in.
By distributing credit across every touchpoint, MTA reveals the true value of each channel in driving conversions.
Instead of guessing which interactions matter most, you gain a holistic, data-driven view of the entire funnel.
In this guide, we’ll break down what multi-touch attribution is, why MTA is critical in modern marketing, the different models you can use, and how to implement them effectively.
You’ll also see how advanced attribution platforms like Northbeam help solve the challenges that often limit other solutions.
What Is Multi-Touch Attribution?
Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA) is a marketing measurement method that assigns credit for a conversion across every touchpoint a customer interacts with along their journey. rather than giving 100% of the credit to the first or last click.
‍Wondering how multi-touch attribution works? At its core, MTA is designed to answer a simple but critical question: Which marketing channels and interactions actually contribute to a sale?
Instead of oversimplifying performance by rewarding only one step, MTA distributes credit proportionally across multiple touchpoints, such as an initial social ad, an email reminder, a retargeting click, and a branded search, to give marketers a more accurate view of what’s driving results.
The core purpose of MTA is to uncover the true influence of each channel in moving prospects down the funnel.
This helps teams optimize spend, refine strategy, and understand how upper-funnel activities (like awareness campaigns) work together with lower-funnel drivers (like paid search or direct visits) to generate conversions.
Why MTA Matters for Marketing
Today’s buyer journeys rarely follow a straight line.
A customer might discover your brand through a TikTok ad, research products via a blog post, sign up for a newsletter, and only weeks later click a retargeting ad before finally purchasing.
If you’re using a single-touch model, all of that complexity gets reduced to one moment: either the very first click or the very last.
The shortcomings of single-touch models include:
- Skewed insights: Last-click attribution tends to overvalue lower-funnel channels like search or retargeting, while first-click attribution may inflate the role of early awareness channels.
- Misallocated budgets: If only one touchpoint receives full credit, marketers risk over-investing in the wrong channels and undervaluing others that actually play a critical supporting role.
- Incomplete customer understanding: Single-touch models can’t show how channels interact across the funnel, making it harder to identify which strategies truly drive momentum toward conversion.
The benefits of multi-touch attribution models are:
- Holistic performance measurement: By distributing credit across multiple touchpoints, MTA captures the real contribution of each channel in the path to purchase.
- Smarter resource allocation: With a clearer sense of which campaigns build awareness, nurture interest, and close deals, marketers can confidently adjust budgets to maximize ROI.
- Stronger customer journeys: MTA highlights the interplay between channels (e.g., how paid social might spark interest that email later converts) so teams can design more effective cross-channel strategies.
Here’s how first-touch, last-touch, and multi-touch attribution models would show credit differently for the same sale:
Consider the following customer journey:
- A customer first discovers your brand through a Google Search ad
- They browse your products on Amazon but don’t buy anything
- They see a TikTok ad that reminds them of your product later
- They open a discount email and click into your website
- They make a direct purchase on your website
Here’s how different attribution models would assign credit for the same purchase:
In short, MTA matters because it acknowledges marketing for what it really is: a multi-step, multi-channel collaboration.
Types of Multi-Touch Attribution Models
Not all multi-touch attribution (MTA) models are created equal. Each framework takes a different approach to distributing credit across touchpoints.
‍
Choosing the right one depends on your goals, data maturity, and the complexity of your customer journeys.
‍
Here are the most common MTA models, with their advantages, drawbacks, and ideal scenarios:
Linear Attribution
- Definition: Credit is divided equally across every touchpoint in the customer journey.
- Pros: Simple to understand and implement; ensures every channel gets recognition.
- Cons: Over-simplifies performance by treating all interactions as equally influential.
- Best For: Brands just starting with MTA, or when you want a “baseline” view of how channels contribute together.
Time Decay Attribution
- Definition: Touchpoints closer to the conversion get more credit, while earlier interactions receive less.
- Pros: Reflects the reality that later-stage actions (like a retargeting click) often have a stronger influence on conversion.
- Cons: Risks undervaluing awareness-building activities; can bias spend toward bottom-of-funnel channels.
- Best For: Shorter sales cycles or campaigns where recency is a reliable indicator of influence.
U-Shaped Attribution (Position-Based)
- Definition: A large portion of credit goes to the first and last touchpoints, with the remainder split among the middle touches.
- Pros: Balances the importance of both awareness (first click) and conversion (last click).
- Cons: Middle touches get minimal recognition, even if they played a critical role in nurturing.
- Best For: Journeys where discovery and conversion are most important milestones, but you still want to capture some mid-funnel activity.
W-Shaped Attribution
- Definition: Similar to U-Shaped, but adds significant credit to a key mid-funnel milestone (such as a form fill or product page view), alongside the first and last touches.
- Pros: Recognizes three critical stages: awareness, lead creation, and conversion.
- Cons: Still assumes a fixed distribution that may not reflect reality for every business.
- Best For: B2B or high-consideration purchases with clear mid-funnel handoffs, such as lead qualification or demo requests.
Algorithmic / Data-Driven Attribution
- Definition: Uses machine learning to dynamically assign credit based on the actual contribution of each touchpoint, leveraging historical and real-time data.
- Pros: Most accurate and customizable; adapts as customer behavior changes.
- Cons: Requires significant data volume and advanced technology; harder to explain to stakeholders.
- Best For: Mature marketing teams with robust data pipelines, complex journeys, and the need for precision.
In practice, no single model is universally “best.”
Many brands start with simpler rules-based models (like Linear or U-Shaped) and evolve toward data-driven approaches as their data capabilities grow.
Single-Touch vs. MTA vs. MMM
Marketers often treat attribution as an “either/or” decision, but in reality, different methods serve different purposes.
Single-Touch Attribution
- What it does: Assigns all credit to the first or last touchpoint.
- Why it’s valuable: Simple to implement, easy to explain to stakeholders, and can provide a quick snapshot of which channels most often open or close conversions.
Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA)
- What it does: Distributes credit across multiple touchpoints to reveal the interplay between channels.
- Why it’s valuable: Offers granular, customer-level insights into what actually drives conversions.
Media Mix Modeling (MMM)
- What it does: Uses aggregated, historical data to measure the overall contribution of each channel to sales.
- Why it’s valuable: Provides a big-picture view of long-term channel effectiveness, including offline and walled-garden channels where user-level data isn’t available.
How Single-Touch, MTA, and MMM Work Together
- MTA is best for tactical optimization: reallocating budget across campaigns and channels in near real time.
- MMM is best for strategic planning: understanding how investments shape growth over months or quarters.
- Single-touch can still be useful as a quick gut-check, but shouldn’t be the only lens you use.
In other words: MTA gives you the microscope, MMM gives you the telescope, and single-touch still has a place as a simple directional compass.
The strongest marketers use all three to see clearly at every level of decision-making.
MTA Challenges and Considerations
While Multi-Touch Attribution can provide unmatched clarity into customer journeys, it’s not without hurdles.
To get reliable insights, marketers need to be aware of the three most common challenges:
1. Data gaps due to privacy restrictions
Regulations like GDPR and CCPA, plus platform policies such as Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT), limit the availability of user-level data.
This makes it harder to connect every touchpoint and can leave blind spots in attribution models.
2. Cross-device attribution issues
Customers rarely stay on a single device: they might click an ad on mobile, research on a laptop, and convert later on a tablet.
Without strong identity resolution, these multi-device journeys can look like separate users, distorting credit assignment.
3. Model selection pitfalls
No model is perfect. Choosing the wrong one for your business can either overcomplicate analysis or lead to misleading conclusions.
For example, relying on time-decay in a long B2B sales cycle may undervalue top-of-funnel touches that actually drive momentum.
The key takeaway: MTA delivers immense value, but its effectiveness depends on high-quality data, thoughtful model selection, and the right technology to close gaps.
How to Implement MTA Effectively
Getting Multi-Touch Attribution right isn’t just about picking a model, it’s about building the right foundation and using the right tools.
Here are the four core steps to make MTA successful:
1. Set clear goals
Define what you want to learn: Are you optimizing budget allocation? Testing new channels? Improving ROI visibility?
Specific objectives ensure your attribution framework delivers actionable insights.
2. Ensure data integrity
Clean, consistent, and complete data is the lifeblood of MTA.
Make sure you’re capturing touchpoints across all channels, including web, email, paid, organic, and offline interactions.
3. Choose the right platform
Attribution is too complex to manage manually. Advanced platforms like Northbeam bring automation, accuracy, and scale to the process.
Unlike generic analytics tools, Northbeam connects performance across the entire funnel, unifies cross-channel data, and adapts to the privacy-first future.
4. Validate and refine
No model is “set and forget.” Regularly compare attribution insights with business outcomes to ensure accuracy.
Iterate as your customer journey evolves; what works for one campaign or season may not apply to the next.
With clear objectives, clean data, and the right technology, MTA becomes more than a reporting tool: it becomes a growth engine.
Making Multi-Touch Attribution Work for You
In a world where customer journeys span dozens of channels and devices, accurate attribution is no longer optional, it’s essential.
Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA) provides the clarity that single-touch models lack, ensuring every stage of the funnel gets the recognition it deserves.
The right model depends on your goals:
- Linear for simplicity
- Time Decay for recency
- U- and W-Shaped for milestone-driven journeys
- Algorithmic approaches for precision at scale.
What matters most is choosing strategically and evolving as your marketing matures.
With a thoughtful approach, and advanced platforms like Northbeam to streamline the process, MTA becomes more than a measurement tool. It becomes the foundation for smarter decisions, stronger customer experiences, and more efficient growth.
What Is GCLID? Complete Guide to Google Click Identifier
Have you ever clicked on a Google Ad and noticed a “?gclid=” string in the URL?
‍This little snippet of code is one of the most important keys to understanding your Google Ad performance.
The Google Click Identifier (GCLID) is how Google connects the dots between an ad click and a conversion.Â
Without it, you can’t reliably tie a purchase, form submission, or sign-up back to the exact campaign, keyword, and creative that drove it. It’s what makes Google Ads’ reporting and optimization features accurate.
Here’s how GCLID works:
- Every time someone clicks on your Google Ad, a unique GCLID is added to the landing page URL.
- That GCLID tells Google which ad was clicked, when, and under what targeting conditions.
- When the person converts, that same GCLID lets Google attribute the result to the right ad spend.
- Combined with UTMs, GCLIDs give you both precise Google Ads tracking and a full multi-channel view of performance.
‍Understanding how GCLID works, and how to make sure you’re capturing it correctly, means more accurate attribution, smarter budget allocation, and a clear picture of ROI.
What Is GCLID?Â
GCLID stands for Google Click Identifier, a unique tracking parameter that Google Ads automatically adds to your landing page URLs whenever someone clicks on your ad.
A GCLID might look something like this:
‍https://www.example.com?gclid=XYZ123
This seemingly random string is actually a powerful tracking tool.Â
Each GCLID is unique to a specific ad click and contains encoded information about the campaign, ad group, keyword, and other targeting details.
The purpose of a GCLID is simple but essential:
- Link each ad click to its source so you can see which campaigns and keywords drive conversions.
- Track performance across the customer journey, from the initial click to the final purchase or lead submission.
- Enable more accurate attribution, helping you understand exactly where your ad spend is delivering the best return.
Because the GCLID is automatically generated and appended by Google Ads, there’s no manual setup required, but you do need to ensure your tracking systems capture and retain it for it to work effectively.
GCLID vs UTMs: How They Work Together
Marketers often confuse GCLID parameters with UTM tags, but they serve different, and complementary, purposes.
‍GCLID is automatic and generated by Google Ads when GCLID auto-tagging is enabled. It’s used primarily for Google Ads conversion tracking and reporting.
‍UTM parameters, on the other hand, are manual tags that you add to URLs yourself (or via a campaign builder tool).Â
UTMs are platform-agnostic and used for cross-channel tracking in analytics tools like Google Analytics, HubSpot, or Northbeam.
‍The table below highlights GCLID vs UTM:
When combined, GCLID gives you the click-level precision Google Ads needs, while UTMs provide the big-picture view across every marketing channel.
How Does GCLID Work?
GCLID works behind the scenes to connect ad clicks with conversion data, and it does this in just a few quick steps:
- A user clicks your Google Ad. When someone clicks on your ad, Google automatically generates a unique Google Click Identifier tied to that specific click.
- Google appends the GCLID to your landing page URL. The click sends the user to your destination URL with the GCLID parameter attached.
- Your analytics tools capture the GCLID. Google Ads and Google Analytics 4 (GA4) read the GCLID and use it to connect the click to details like the campaign, ad group, keyword, and timestamp.
- The GCLID links clicks to conversions. When a user completes a tracked action, such as filling out a form, signing up for a trial, or making a purchase, the GCLID makes it possible to attribute that conversion back to the exact ad interaction.
This process is instant and invisible to the end user, but for marketers, it’s the backbone of accurate Google Ads reporting and optimization.
Why Is GCLID Important?Â
GCLID isn’t just a random string in your URLs. it’s the key to making your Google Ads budget work harder. Here’s why it matters:
Conversion Tracking
Without GCLID, Google Ads can’t reliably match ad clicks to conversions.Â
By linking each conversion back to the specific click that drove it, you can measure the true impact of your campaigns and justify your ad spend with GCLID for conversion tracking.
Offline Conversions
Many conversions happen offline, like a phone order, in-store purchase, or signed contract.Â
If you capture the GCLID from the original ad click (e.g., in a CRM form), you can later upload that data into Google Ads to connect offline sales with the campaigns that generated them.
Attribution Accuracy
GCLID provides click-level data that helps you understand exactly which campaign, keyword, and creative led to a conversion. This level of detail allows you to:
- Optimize bidding strategies
- Pause underperforming ads
- Double down on high-ROI campaigns
‍In short, if you’re not tracking GCLID, you’re flying blind on where your ad dollars are actually paying off.
How to Enable and Track GCLIDÂ
Setting up GCLID tracking takes just a few steps, and once it’s in place, you’ll have a stronger foundation for measuring and improving your Google Ads performance.
Enable Auto-Tagging in Google Ads
Auto-tagging automatically appends the GCLID parameter to your ad URLs.
To turn it on:
- Sign in to your Google Ads account.
- Click the Admin (wrench icon) in the top menu and select Account Settings.
- Under Auto-tagging, check the box for “Tag the URL that people click through from my ad”.
- Click Save.
You can test this by clicking on one of your own ads and confirming the URL includes a ?gclid= parameter.
Link Google Ads with Google Analytics 4 (GA4)
Wondering how GCLID works in GA4 and Google Analytics? Linking the two tools ensures your GCLID data flows between Google Ads and Analytics for full-funnel reporting.
To link accounts:
- In Google Ads, go to Tools & Settings → Linked accounts.
- Choose Google Analytics (GA4) and select the property you want to link.
- Enable Personalized advertising and Auto-tagging override if prompted.
Capture GCLID in Your CRM for Offline Conversions
If you track leads or sales outside your website (phone calls, in-store purchases, signed contracts), capturing the GCLID lets you later upload offline conversions to Google Ads.
Best practices:
- Add a hidden form field on your lead forms to store the GCLID from the URL.
- Pass the value into your CRM or marketing automation platform.
- When a sale closes, export the GCLID and upload it to Google Ads via the Offline Conversions tool.
Use Google Tag Manager (GTM) to Grab GCLID from URLs
Google Tag Manager can capture the GCLID without extra coding.
Here are the steps:
- In GTM, create a URL Variable that pulls the gclid query parameter.
- Store this variable in a cookie or send it to your analytics platform.
- Use it for attribution and offline conversion uploads.
‍With these steps in place, every ad click, whether it converts online or offline, can be accurately tracked and attributed back to the campaign that drove it.
Common Issues with GCLID and How to Fix ThemÂ
Even if you’ve enabled auto-tagging, GCLID tracking can break without you realizing it, leading to incomplete or inaccurate data.Â
‍Here are the most common issues and how to resolve them.
Lost GCLID During Redirects
Issue: When your landing page URL redirects (for example, from http:// to https://, or via geo-redirects), the GCLID parameter can be stripped from the URL.
‍Fix:Â
- Ensure all redirects pass query parameters to the final destination URL.
- Update your server or CMS settings to preserve parameters during redirects.
Auto-Tagging Not Enabled in Google Ads
Issue: Without auto-tagging, GCLIDs will never be appended to your URLs in the first place.
‍Fix:
- In Google Ads, go to Account Settings → Auto-tagging and check “Tag the URL that people click through from my ad”.
- Test by clicking on a live ad and confirming the GCLID appears in the address bar.
Tracking Discrepancies Between Google Ads and Analytics
Issue: You see conversions in Google Ads that aren’t reflected in Google Analytics, or vice versa.
‍Fix:
- Confirm your Google Ads and GA4 accounts are linked.
- Check that your GCLID in Google Analytics property is set to collect Google Signals data.
- Ensure time zones and attribution settings align between platforms.
Troubleshooting Checklist
Use this quick checklist to identify and fix GCLID tracking issues:
- Click on a live Google Ad and check for ?gclid= in the URL.
- Confirm redirects are preserving query parameters.
- Test landing pages in Google Tag Assistant to verify GCLID auto-tagging is working.
- Review the linking status of GCLID in Google Analytics and Google Ads.
- Check form and CRM setups for proper GCLID capture.
Best Practices for GCLID TrackingÂ
To get the most value from GCLID data, and ensure you never lose critical conversion insights, follow these best practices:
Always Enable Auto-Tagging in Google Ads
Auto-tagging is the easiest way to ensure GCLIDs are appended to your URLs. Without it, you’ll lose click-level tracking in Google Ads.
Test Ad URLs Regularly
Periodically click on your live ads to confirm the ?gclid= parameter appears in the address bar. This helps catch broken tracking before it impacts reporting.
Capture GCLID in Your Backend Systems
Add a hidden form field to your lead capture forms to store the GCLID from the landing page URL. Pass this value into your CRM so it’s available for offline conversion uploads.
Combine GCLID Data with UTM Parameters
GCLID provides precise Google Ads tracking, while UTMs give you a cross-channel view. Using both ensures you can attribute conversions across your full marketing mix.
Preserve GCLID During Redirects
If your site uses redirects, make sure query parameters are passed along to the final landing page so you don’t lose tracking data.
‍With these best practices in place, you’ll have a reliable, consistent flow of data, giving you confidence in your ROI calculations and campaign optimizations.
The Bottom Line on GCLID
The Google Click Identifier (GCLID) may be just a small snippet in your URL, but it’s a big deal for marketers who want accurate, actionable insights from their Google Ads campaigns.Â
By capturing and preserving GCLIDs, you can:
- Confidently link ad spend to conversions
- Track offline sales alongside online actions
- Gain click-level attribution for smarter optimization
Whether you’re running small campaigns or managing a large ad budget, getting GCLID tracking right is essential for measuring ROI and making data-driven decisions.
Product
RESOURCES
Support
Legal
Follow us
.svg)
